All comparisons / PullLight vs Greptile
See full comparison →
// switching from Greptile?

PullLight vs Greptile — which AI code reviewer should you choose?

Greptile goes deep — multi-hop codebase reasoning, indexed context. But it still auto-posts. And at $30/dev/mo plus overages, it reprices every time your team grows.

◈ PullLight
$20/mo flat
Whole team · No overages · Human approval gate · Fast diff-only analysis
Greptile
$30/dev/mo + overages
Per seat · $1/review beyond 50/dev/mo · Full codebase index
// side-by-side comparison

How they compare.

Pricing verified from public sources as of June 2026. Where a competitor's stance is unclear we mark it Unclear.

Feature ◈ PullLight Greptile
Comment publishing Human approval required
Queue at /reviews — you approve or discard each finding
Auto-publish
Posts inline comments directly after analysis completes
Pricing model $20/mo flat — whole team $30 per developer/mo + overages
50 reviews/dev/mo included; $1/review beyond that
Cost at 10 developers $20/mo $300+/mo
Base $300; overages likely with AI agent workflows
Codebase indexing Diff-only analysis
Claude analyzes the PR diff; no repo-wide indexing required
Full codebase index
Multi-hop codebase reasoning; understands cross-file context
One-click fix suggestions Yes — native GitHub suggestion blocks
Approved comments with an unambiguous fix include a ``` suggestion block. One click, merged.
No
Greptile posts finding comments; no GitHub suggestion-block integration
AI model Claude Sonnet 4.5 Claude Agent SDK
Anthropic Claude with multi-agent investigation chains
Setup time ~5 minutes
GitHub App install; no indexing wait
~10–15 minutes
Repo indexing required before first review is available
Overage charges None
Flat $20/mo regardless of PR volume
Yes
$1/review after 50/dev/mo; agent workflows blow past this fast
Self-host Roadmap Enterprise only

Source: greptile.com/pricing — verified June 2026.

// the pricing math

For a 10-dev team: Greptile = $300+/mo. PullLight = $20/mo. And Greptile overages stack when agents ship more PRs.

Greptile (base) $300/mo 10 devs at $30/dev
Greptile (with overages) $300+/mo each agent-generated PR past quota = $1
◈ PullLight $20/mo whole team, all PRs, flat

Greptile's 50-review-per-seat cap was designed for 2024 PR volumes. Claude Code and Cursor weren't the norm yet. In 2025, a single AI coding agent can open more than 50 PRs per developer per month without blinking. Greptile even acknowledged this when they introduced overages. PullLight has no such ceiling — flat $20/mo regardless of how many PRs your agents ship.

// the honest take

When Greptile is the right call — and when it isn't.

Greptile earns its reputation on depth. The indexed codebase approach means it understands that a function change on line 42 breaks an invariant established three files away. If you work on a large, tightly-coupled monorepo and need cross-file reasoning, Greptile's analysis is genuinely richer than a diff-only reviewer.

The tradeoffs are real though. Indexing takes time on first setup. And once reviews are flowing, they auto-post — your PR fills with AI comments before a human has looked. The per-seat pricing plus overage model also creates billing surprises the moment your team adopts an AI coding agent workflow.

PullLight trades depth for precision. It doesn't index your whole codebase — it analyzes the diff and queues findings for a human to approve. If most of your bugs are visible in the diff (auth issues, null pointer derefs, SQL injection), you don't need cross-repo context. You need a human to decide before the comment posts. That's what PullLight does.

Where Greptile wins
  • Full codebase indexing — Greptile understands cross-file context and multi-hop dependencies PullLight's diff-only analysis misses.
  • Larger monorepo support — useful for tightly coupled codebases where a single function change has far-reaching implications.
  • Multi-agent architecture — specialized agents per check type (security, logic, test coverage).
Where ◈ PullLight wins
  • Human-in-the-loop approval gate — nothing posts to your PR until a human approves it. Greptile auto-posts.
  • Flat pricing — $20/mo for the whole team. No overages, no per-seat math, no billing surprises when agents ship more PRs.
  • 8/8 benchmark score — PullLight caught all 8 CVE-confirmed bugs in head-to-head testing.
  • Zero indexing wait — no setup delay before your first review is available.
  • One-click Fix PRs — multi-file patch opened as a real GitHub PR.
// real catches, real diffs

PullLight in the wild.

Case study · CVE-2026-1774
CASL prototype pollution auth bypass — competitors missed it
@casl/ability setByPath() walks __proto__ without guard. PullLight caught CVE-2026-1774 (CVSS 9.8) — CodeRabbit and others missed it.
Read case study →
Case study · CVE-2026-44578
Next.js WebSocket SSRF — caught before merge
A server-side request forgery vulnerability in a Next.js app. PullLight flagged it in the diff. The PR was blocked. The CVE was never shipped.
Read case study →
Live feed · Public catches
Every bug PullLight found — privacy-safe, timestamped, public
No other AI code reviewer publishes what they catch. PullLight does. Every finding here passed human review before it posted to GitHub.
Browse catches →
// frequently asked

PullLight vs Greptile — common questions.

Does Greptile have a human approval gate before posting? +
No. Greptile posts inline comments directly after analysis completes. PullLight queues every finding at /reviews — nothing posts until a human approves it.
How does the pricing compare for a 10-person team? +
Greptile is $30/dev/mo base, plus $1/review overage after 50 reviews per developer per month. A 10-person team pays $300/mo base — and overages hit fast when AI coding agents start opening more PRs. PullLight is $20/mo flat regardless of team size or PR volume.
What's the trade-off between Greptile's codebase indexing and PullLight's diff-only analysis? +
Greptile's codebase index gives it cross-file context — it can detect that a change on line 42 breaks an invariant established three files away. PullLight analyzes the diff only, which is faster and requires no setup but misses cross-repo dependencies. For most security, null-safety, and logic bugs, the diff is sufficient. For large, tightly coupled monorepos, Greptile's indexing provides genuine additional depth.
Can I try PullLight without uninstalling Greptile? +
Yes. PullLight installs as a separate GitHub App and can run alongside Greptile. See the migration guide for a side-by-side setup.
Does PullLight have overage charges like Greptile? +
No. PullLight is $20/mo flat — unlimited PRs, unlimited developers. There are no overage fees regardless of how many PRs your team or AI agents submit.
// see also
vs CodeRabbit vs Copilot PR Review vs Graphite Diamond vs Qodo Merge vs Cursor Bugbot vs Pricing Full comparison matrix → Live benchmarks →
// try it yourself

See PullLight in 30 seconds.

No install required. Paste a PR URL or raw diff — Claude analyzes it and returns structured findings instantly.

Done with the noise?

Join teams using PullLight for human-approved AI code review — $20/mo flat, cancel anytime.

Ready to switch? See the migration guide →